This was from a close-up of the asters that bloom every October in my garden. The bees love them, and I caught this one collecting his pollen. I decided I'd take this close-up and make a painting from it, using a technique I have seen others--notably Brenda Swenson and Joe Cibere--use. (I have never taken their workshops teaching negative painting, and this is my first unschooled attempt.)
Basically, you do the drawing lightly, and then you do an under-wash of your lightest color or colors, in this case a graduated pale lavender to pale green. So far, so good:
Then you paint in layers. You leave your lightest colors (the petals on the asters, in this case) the original under-wash color, and you paint around them with the next darkest color, and then put in the next darkest, and the next darkest, each time defining the lighter parts of the painting by painting around them with darker areas to define them.
It sounds easy in theory. In practice, I found it both difficult and boring. You have to really focus on how you are going to make your lights stand out, and you also have to do a lot of waiting in between coats of paint before you can go on to the next one. Also, you have to have a good sense of the negative spaces in your painting, which I did not (the photograph being a bit indistinct in certain areas and I too inexperienced at this to know what to do with them), and you have to know how to deal with both positives and negatives as you move towards the finishing touches, which I found confusing.
In short, I got frustrated and bored, and I finally just stopped. In some areas of the painting, I stopped too soon, while in other areas, I stopped too late, leaving some parts unfinished looking while others are overworked! I felt like I was doing a paint-by-numbers project!
So this was a good exercise to teach me one of two things: Either I shouldn't attempt stuff without watching a pro do it and getting advice; or I should be more patient and committed to the process and be willing to practice more than once before giving up on it. But honestly, I just don't think it's my kind of technique. Anyway, for what it's worth, here it is. Maybe I'll try another someday.
Well, you may not have enjoyed doing it, but your results are stunning!
ReplyDeleteOh man, I think this is gorgeous!
ReplyDeleteI don't know about which parts are over or under worked but this draws your eyes to a center of interest (the blossom with the wasp) and the other parts just aren't the center of interest. So they shouldn't get so much detail anyway.
If I could do this, I'd be very pleased....matter of fact, this will be my next try-it project in my sketchbook.
Thank you for showing us!
Thank you both, you're so kind. If you want to see what negative painting can look like from the hands of an expert, click on Brenda Swenson's name in my blog post to go to her website, and look through her gallery. I particularly love the one with the pomegranates.
DeleteI did, and though she has great skills, your painting has a lot more verve!
ReplyDelete